The loudness of a sound or noise depends on the amplitude of the vibration, which in turn depends on the force exerted on the body generating the vibration. From a scientific point of view, loudness is precisely measurable, whereas on the staff, loudness does not have an absolute but a relative value. This is why in music we don't speak of intensity of sound, but of dynamics.
Scientific and relative measurement: the dynamics
In the scientific field, the intensity of sounds and noises is measured exactly, and the unit of measurement is the decibel (Db). In the language of music, however, the measurement of intensity has completely different methods and purposes. In particular, on the staff, indications of the intensity of sounds always have a relative value.
In music, we are never interested in knowing the actual intensity of a sound or a musical phrase, only its intensity in relation to other notes and phrases. Or even, in relation to other pieces that precede or follow the musical composition. The indications that we find on the staff regarding intensity or volume within a piece of music are called dynamics.
How to write dynamics
Dynamics notation was established between the 17th and 18th centuries. There are three different ways of writing dynamic indications, these three systems are not alternative but often coexist in the same piece, in an attempt to express the composer's intention as clearly as possible.
Dynamic indications with letters: from ppp to fff
The most common method of indicating the dynamics of a piece or part of a piece is to use two- or three-letter abbreviations with the following meaning:
|ppp||pianissimo||as quiet as possible|
|pp||molto piano||very quiet|
|mp||mezzo piano||medium quiet|
|mf||mezzo forte||medium loud|
|ff||molto forte||very loud|
|fff||fortissimo||as loud as possible|
While the marks at the extremes of this scale are quite clear in themselves, this is not the case for mp (mezzo piano) and mf (mezzo forte). In order to interpret these marks well, we must remember that they are in the middle of the 'dynamics scale', so mp is a little louder than p and mf is a little less loud than f.
Especially mp (mezzo piano) lends itself to misunderstandings, sometimes those unfamiliar with the system mistakenly think that mp is quieter than p.
If you play an instrument but have never made friends with the staff, maybe it's time to give it a try. Reading music is not difficult. On this website you will find a solfeggio course to learn to read music in a gradual and fun way. Give it a try, you'll learn to read music much sooner than you think!
Sometimes the dynamic marks are replaced by the full written indication, e.g. piano or forte. Often this is done at the beginning of the piece, so that the performer can read and dwell on the indication before starting to play. Within the piece it is recommended to use the abbreviated form, which is more concise and quicker to read.
Indications consisting of letters can be reinforced by più (more) or meno (less). For example: più f, meno f
Sometimes composers extend the system by adding other f's or p's to the extremes, e.g. ffff or ppppp. The use of these symbols is somewhat unnecessary, because ppp and fff should already represent an absolute superlative: the flattest/strongest possible.
Relative dynamics and subjective dynamics
That of the composer can only be a hope, because as we have already said, dynamic directions are relative, and we can also say that they are subjective. What is loud for me may be flat for someone else. This is not only true for the listener, but it applies to the performer as well.
In fact, each musician has his own basic sound, which he considers neither loud nor soft. For example, on the piano it depends partly on the weight and size of the hand, and to an even greater extent on the temperament of the pianist. I remember my piano teacher telling me to play louder, what sounded like a fortissimo to me was barely a mezzo forte to him.
Regardless of the instrument, every performer has a dynamic zone in which he or she usually plays, if he or she doesn't make an effort to play quieter or louder. In principle there is nothing wrong with having a personal approach to the music and the instrument we play, but from the composer's point of view this can be a problem, because the piece risks being completely misinterpreted.
On the other hand, the performer should also be aware of this and try to go beyond his own habits, or he should choose a repertoire that is close to his own personality.
Let us now illustrate two other ways to write dynamic directions.
Crescendo and diminuendo
While some art forms, e.g. painting and sculpture, exist in the same way for a second as for a minute, in music everything is relative and related to the passage of time. This peculiarity of music makes it essential to note on the score not only the intensity per se, but also the transition from one intensity to a lower or higher one.
There are two alternative and complementary ways of doing this. The first is the use of specific terms such as cresc. (crescendo), dim. (diminuendo) or decresc. (decrescendo, more rarely used). Here is the meaning of these Italian words:
- cresc. (crescendo): grow gradually louder
- dim. (diminuendo) and decresc. (decrescendo): gradually softer
These indications may be accompanied by specifications such as:
- molto,very much
- poco, little
- poco a poco, little by little
- subito, immediately
We can thus find a wide range of indications such as cresc. poco a poco, dim. molto, subito cres. and so on.
There are also graphic signs called hairpins, which indicate more precisely where the crescendo or diminuendo begins and ends in a piece of music. Hairpins are not dissimilar to the volume indications often found on electronic devices: hifi, televisions, radios.
Since the system of musical notation is much older than sound reproduction technologies, it is likely that the use of this symbol to indicate volume was derived from musical language.
Final remarks: intensity and dynamics
In this lesson we have seen how in music the approach to intensity is entirely relative and subjective, not subject to the need for precise measurements.
Scientific approach → measurement in absolute values → intensity
Musical language → relative and subjective indications → dynamics
- Linguaggio musicale → indicazioni relative e soggettive → dinamica
We have also presented the three systems used for notating dynamics: letter indications (e.g. f, mp, fff), terms written in full (forte, piano, cresc. dim., poco a poco, subito etc.) and finally, hairpins. As always, if you have any questions or comments about this lesson, please write them in the comments below. Thank you!